Journal cover Journal topic
Climate of the Past An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
© Author(s) 2009. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
13 Mar 2009
Review status
This discussion paper is a preprint. A revision of the manuscript for further review has not been submitted.
Comparison of simulated and observed vegetation for the mid-Holocene in Europe
S. Brewer1, L. François1, R. Cheddadi2, J.-M. Laurent1, and E. Favre1 1Institut d'Astrophysique et de Géophysique, Université de Liège, Bat. B5c, 17 Allée du Six Août, 4000 Liège, Belgium
2Université Montpellier II, Institut des Sciences de l'Evolution, case postale 61 CNRS UMR 5554, 34095 Montpellier, France
Abstract. Past climates provide a testing bed for the predictive ability of general circulation models. A number of studies have been performed for periods where the climate forcings are relatively different from the present and there is a good coverage of data. For one of these periods, the mid-Holocene (6 ka before present), models and data show a good match over northern Europe, but disagree over the south, where the data show cooler summers and winters and more humid conditions. Understanding the reasons for this disagreement is important given the expected vulnerability of the region under scenarios of future change. We present here a set of different past climate scenarios and sensitivity studies with a global vegetation model in order to try and understand this disagreement. The results show that the vegetation changes can be explained by a combination of both increased precipitation, and a reduction in the length of the growing season, controlled by a reduction in winter temperatures. The matching simulated circulation patterns support the hypothesis of increased westerly flow over this region.

Citation: Brewer, S., François, L., Cheddadi, R., Laurent, J.-M., and Favre, E.: Comparison of simulated and observed vegetation for the mid-Holocene in Europe, Clim. Past Discuss.,, in review, 2009.
S. Brewer et al.
Interactive discussionStatus: closed (peer review stopped)
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version      Supplement - Supplement
RC S297: 'Anonymous Referee #2', Anonymous Referee #2, 27 Jun 2009 Printer-friendly Version 
RC S302: 'Review of the manuscript', Anonymous Referee #1, 09 Jul 2009 Printer-friendly Version 
S. Brewer et al.
S. Brewer et al.


Total article views: 1,116 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)

HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
345 697 74 1,116 24 66

Views and downloads (calculated since 01 Feb 2013)

Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 01 Feb 2013)



Latest update: 22 Oct 2017
Publications Copernicus