Journal cover Journal topic
Climate of the Past An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
© Author(s) 2017. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Research article
10 Feb 2017
Review status
This discussion paper is a preprint. A revision of the manuscript was accepted for the journal Climate of the Past (CP).
Quantifying the Influence of the Terrestrial Biosphere on Glacial-interglacial Climate Dynamics
Taraka Davies-Barnard1, Andy Ridgwell1,2, Joy Singarayer3, and Paul Valdes1 1BRIDGE, Cabot Institute, and School of Geographical Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1SS, UK
2Department of Earth Sciences, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, USA
3Department of Meteorology and Centre for Past Climate Change, University of Reading, P.O. Box 243, Whiteknights Campus, Reading, RG6 6BB, UK
Abstract. The terrestrial biosphere is thought to be a key component in the climatic variability seen in the paleo record. It has a direct impact on surface temperature through changes in surface albedo and evapotranspiration (so called biogeophysical effects) and in addition, has an important indirect effect through changes in vegetation and soil carbon storage (biogeochemical effects) and hence modulates the concentrations of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere. The biogeochemical and biogeophysical effects generally have opposite signs meaning that the terrestrial biosphere could potentially have played only a very minor role in the dynamics of the glacial-interglacial cycles of the late Quaternary. Here we use a fully-coupled dynamic atmosphere-ocean-vegetation General Circulation Model (GCM) to generate a set of 62 simulations spanning the last 120 ka. The analysis of these simulations elucidates the relative importance of the biogeophysical versus biogeochemical terrestrial biosphere interactions with climate. We find that the biogeophysical effects of vegetation account for up to an additional −0.84 °C global mean cooling, with regional cooling as large as −5 °C, but with considerable variability across the glacial-interglacial cycle. By comparison, while opposite in sign, our model estimates of the biogeochemical impacts are substantially smaller in magnitude. Offline simulations show a maximum of +0.33 °C warming due an increase of 25 ppm above our (pre-industrial) baseline atmospheric CO2 mixing ratio. In contrast to shorter (century) time-scale projections of future terrestrial biosphere response where direct and indirect responses may at times, cancel out, we find that the biogeophysical effects consistently and strongly dominate the biogeochemical effect over the inter-glacial cycle. In addition, depending on the assumptions about soil carbon under ice-sheets and sea level rise, we find a range in terrestrial carbon storage change from a reduction in LGM carbon storage of −440 PgC, to a gain of +37 PgC. We suggest that prevailing uncertainties allow for only a small net transfer of carbon between terrestrial biosphere and ocean atmosphere implying that explaining the observed CO2 ice core record could be rather simpler than previously thought.

Citation: Davies-Barnard, T., Ridgwell, A., Singarayer, J., and Valdes, P.: Quantifying the Influence of the Terrestrial Biosphere on Glacial-interglacial Climate Dynamics, Clim. Past Discuss.,, in review, 2017.
Taraka Davies-Barnard et al.
Taraka Davies-Barnard et al.
Taraka Davies-Barnard et al.


Total article views: 658 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)

HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
523 81 54 658 3 57

Views and downloads (calculated since 10 Feb 2017)

Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 10 Feb 2017)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 658 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)

Thereof 650 with geography defined and 8 with unknown origin.

Country # Views %
  • 1



Latest update: 19 Sep 2017
Publications Copernicus
Short summary
Here we present the first model analysis using a fully-coupled dynamic atmosphere-ocean-vegetation GCM over the last 120 ka, that quantifies the net effect of vegetation on climate. This analysis shows that over the whole period the biogeophysical is the dominant effect, and that the biogeochemical impacts may have a lower possible range than typically estimated. This emphasises the temporal reliance of the balance between biogeophysical and biogeochemical effects.
Here we present the first model analysis using a fully-coupled dynamic...