"Examining bias in pollen-based quantitative climate reconstructions induced by human impact on vegetation" - Interactive discussionhttps://www.clim-past-discuss.net/cp-2017-63/2017-08-25T23:24:13+02:00Copernicus Publicationshttps://www.clim-past-discuss.net/cp-2017-63/cp-2017-63-AC2.pdfAC2: 'Response to Reviewer #2', Wei Ding, 25 Aug 2017AC2: 'Response to Reviewer #2', Wei Ding, 25 Aug 2017Wei Ding2017-08-25T23:24:12+02:002017-08-25T23:24:12+02:00https://www.clim-past-discuss.net/cp-2017-63/cp-2017-63-AC1.pdfAC1: 'Response to Reviewer #1', Wei Ding, 25 Aug 2017AC1: 'Response to Reviewer #1', Wei Ding, 25 Aug 2017Wei Ding2017-08-25T22:57:53+02:002017-08-25T22:57:53+02:00https://www.clim-past-discuss.net/cp-2017-63/cp-2017-63-RC2.pdfRC2: 'this paper is well written, very clear and concise, and sufficiently interdisciplinary in content to be published in Climate of the Past', Anonymous Referee #2, 29 Jun 2017RC2: 'this paper is well written, very clear and concise, and sufficiently interdisciplinary in content to be published in Climate of the Past', Anonymous Referee #2, 29 Jun 2017Anonymous Referee #22017-06-29T13:45:56+02:002017-06-29T13:45:56+02:00https://www.clim-past-discuss.net/cp-2017-63/cp-2017-63-RC1.pdfRC1: 'A good example to illustrate the difference between pure-natural and human-impact effect on vegetation', Anonymous Referee #1, 18 May 2017RC1: 'A good example to illustrate the difference between pure-natural and human-impact effect on vegetation', Anonymous Referee #1, 18 May 2017Anonymous Referee #12017-05-18T14:41:13+02:002017-05-18T14:41:13+02:00