<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article SYSTEM "http://www.clim-past-discuss.net/inc/cpd/copernicus.dtd">
<article language="en">
	<journal>
		<journal_title>Climate of the Past Discussions</journal_title>
		<journal_url>www.clim-past-discuss.net</journal_url>
		<issn>1814-9340</issn>
		<eissn>1814-9359</eissn>
		<volume_number>2</volume_number>
		<issue_number>5</issue_number>
		<publication_year>2006</publication_year>
	</journal>
	<doi>10.5194/cpd-2-923-2006</doi>
	<article_url>http://www.clim-past-discuss.net/2/923/2006/</article_url>
	<abstract_html>http://www.clim-past-discuss.net/2/923/2006/cpd-2-923-2006.html</abstract_html>
	<fulltext_pdf>http://www.clim-past-discuss.net/2/923/2006/cpd-2-923-2006.pdf</fulltext_pdf>
	<start_page>923</start_page>
	<end_page>949</end_page>
	<publication_date>2006-10-11</publication_date>
	<article_title content_type="html">The modern and glacial overturning circulation in the Atlantic ocean in PMIP coupled model simulations</article_title>
	<authors>
		<author numeration="1" affiliations="1">
			<name>S. L. Weber</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="2" affiliations="1">
			<name>S. S. Drijfhout</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="3" affiliations="2">
			<name>A. Abe-Ouchi</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="4" affiliations="3">
			<name>M. Crucifix</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="5" affiliations="4">
			<name>M. Eby</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="6" affiliations="5">
			<name>A. Ganopolski</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="7" affiliations="6">
			<name>S. Murakami</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="8" affiliations="7">
			<name>B. Otto-Bliesner</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="9" affiliations="8">
			<name>W. R. Peltier</name>
		</author>
	</authors>
	<affiliations>
		<affiliation numeration="1" content_type="html">Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute (KNMI), De Bilt, The Netherlands</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="2" content_type="html">Center for Climate System Research, The University of Tokyo Kashiwa, Japan</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="3" content_type="html">Hadley Center for Climate Prediction and Research, Met Office, Exeter, United Kingdom</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="4" content_type="html">School of Earth and Ocean Sciences, University of Victoria, Victoria, Canada</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="5" content_type="html">Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, Potsdam, Germany</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="6" content_type="html">Meteorological Research Institute, Tsukuba, and Frontier Research Center for Global Change, JAMSTEC, Yokohama, Japan</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="7" content_type="html">National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, U.S.A.</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="8" content_type="html">Department of Physics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada</affiliation>
	</affiliations>
	<abstract content_type="html">The simulation of the Atlantic thermohaline circulation (THC) during the Last
Glacial Maximum (LGM) provides an important benchmark for models used to
predict future climatic changes. This study analyses the THC response to LGM
forcings and boundary conditions in nine PMIP simulations, including both GCMs and Earth system Models of
Intermediate Complexity. It is examined whether the mechanism put forward in the
literature for a glacial THC reduction in one model also plays a dominant role
in other models. In five models the THC reduces during the LGM (by 5&amp;ndash;40%),
whereas four models show an increase (by 10&amp;ndash;40%). In all models but one
a reduced (enhanced) THC goes with a stronger (weaker) reversed deep
overturning cell associated with the formation of Antarctic Bottom
Water (AABW).  It is found that a major controlling
factor for the THC response is the density contrast between AABW and North Atlantic
Deep Water (NADW) during the LGM as compared to the modern climate. More saline
AABW is consistently found in all simulations, while all models but one show
less cooling of AABW as compared to NADW. In five out of nine models
a reduced (enhanced) THC during the LGM is associated with more (less) dense
AABW at its source region, which in turn is determined by the balance between the opposing effects of
salinity and temperature on the density of AABW versus that of NADW.
The response in net evaporation over the Atlantic basin is relatively small
in most models, so that changes in the freshwater budget are dominated by
ocean transports. In only two models is the THC response during the LGM
directly related to the response in net evaporation.</abstract>
	<references>
	</references>
</article>

