<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article SYSTEM "http://www.clim-past-discuss.net/inc/cpd/copernicus.dtd">
<article language="en">
	<journal>
		<journal_title>Climate of the Past Discussions</journal_title>
		<journal_url>www.clim-past-discuss.net</journal_url>
		<issn>1814-9340</issn>
		<eissn>1814-9359</eissn>
		<volume_number>2</volume_number>
		<issue_number>4</issue_number>
		<publication_year>2006</publication_year>
	</journal>
	<doi>10.5194/cpd-2-399-2006</doi>
	<article_url>http://www.clim-past-discuss.net/2/399/2006/</article_url>
	<abstract_html>http://www.clim-past-discuss.net/2/399/2006/cpd-2-399-2006.html</abstract_html>
	<fulltext_pdf>http://www.clim-past-discuss.net/2/399/2006/cpd-2-399-2006.pdf</fulltext_pdf>
	<start_page>399</start_page>
	<end_page>448</end_page>
	<publication_date>2006-07-12</publication_date>
	<article_title content_type="html">Past temperature reconstructions from deep ice cores: relevance for future climate change</article_title>
	<authors>
		<author numeration="1" affiliations="1">
			<name>V. Masson-Delmotte</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="2" affiliations="1">
			<name>G. Dreyfus</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="3" affiliations="1">
			<name>P. Braconnot</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="4" affiliations="2">
			<name>S. Johnsen</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="5" affiliations="1">
			<name>J. Jouzel</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="6" affiliations="1">
			<name>M. Kageyama</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="7" affiliations="1,3">
			<name>A. Landais</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="8" affiliations="4">
			<name>M.-F. Loutre</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="9" affiliations="1">
			<name>J. Nouet</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="10" affiliations="5">
			<name>F. Parrenin</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="11" affiliations="5">
			<name>D. Raynaud</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="12" affiliations="6">
			<name>B. Stenni</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="13" affiliations="7">
			<name>E. Tuenter</name>
		</author>
	</authors>
	<affiliations>
		<affiliation numeration="1" content_type="html">Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l’Environnement, CEA-CNRS-UVSQ, Bat 701 L’Orme des Merisiers, CEA Saclay, 91 191 Gif-sur-Yvette cédex, France</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="2" content_type="html">Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="3" content_type="html">Institute of Earth Sciences, Hebrew University, Givat Ram, Jerusalem, Israel</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="4" content_type="html">Institut d’Astronomie et de Géophysique Georges Lemaitre, Université Catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgique</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="5" content_type="html">Laboratoire de Glaciologie et Géophysique de l’Environnement, CNRS-UJF, BP 96 38402 Saint Martin d’Heres Cedex, France</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="6" content_type="html">Department of Geological, Environmental and Marine Sciences, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="7" content_type="html">Department of Earth Sciences, University of Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands</affiliation>
	</affiliations>
	<abstract content_type="html">Ice cores provide unique archives of past climate and environmental changes
based only on physical processes. Quantitative temperature reconstructions
are essential for the comparison between ice core records and climate
models. Several methods have been developed to reconstruct past local
temperatures from deep ice cores.
&lt;P&gt;
Here we first analyse the long term fluctuations of temperature as depicted
in the long Antarctic record from EPICA Dome C. The long term imprint of
obliquity changes in the EPICA Dome C record is highlighted and compared to
simulations conducted with the ECBILT-CLIO intermediate complexity climate
model. We discuss the comparison between the current interglacial period and
the long interglacial corresponding to marine isotopic stage 11, ~400 kyr BP. Previous studies had focused on the role of precession and the
thresholds required to induce glacial inceptions. We suggest that, due to
the low eccentricity configuration of MIS 11 and the Holocene, the effect of
precession on the incoming solar radiation is damped and that changes in
obliquity must be taken into account. The EPICA Dome C alignment of
terminations I and VI published in 2004 corresponds to a phasing of the
obliquity signals. A conjunction of low obliquity and minimum northern
hemisphere summer insolation is not found in the next tens of thousand
years, supporting the idea of an unusually long interglacial ahead.
&lt;P&gt;
As a second point relevant for future climate change, we discuss the
magnitude and rate of change of past temperatures reconstructed from
Greenland (NorthGRIP) and Antarctic (Dome C) ice cores. Past episodes of
temperatures above the present-day values by up to 5&amp;deg;C are recorded at
both locations during the penultimate interglacial period. The polar warming
simulated by coupled climate models forced by a CO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; increase of 1%
per year is compared to ice-core-based temperature reconstructions. In
Antarctica, the CO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;-induced warming lies clearly beyond the natural
rhythm of temperature fluctuations. In Greenland, the CO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;-induced
warming is as fast or faster than the most rapid temperature shifts of the
last ice age. The magnitude of polar temperature change in response to a
quadrupling of atmospheric CO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; is comparable to the magnitude of the
polar temperature change from the Last Glacial Maximum to present-day. When
forced by prescribed changes in ice sheet reconstructions and CO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; changes, climate models systematically underestimate the
glacial-interglacial polar temperature change.</abstract>
	<references>
	</references>
</article>

