<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article SYSTEM "http://www.clim-past-discuss.net/inc/cpd/copernicus.dtd">
<article language="en">
	<journal>
		<journal_title>Climate of the Past Discussions</journal_title>
		<journal_url>www.clim-past-discuss.net</journal_url>
		<issn>1814-9340</issn>
		<eissn>1814-9359</eissn>
		<volume_number>2</volume_number>
		<issue_number>4</issue_number>
		<publication_year>2006</publication_year>
	</journal>
	<doi>10.5194/cpd-2-357-2006</doi>
	<article_url>http://www.clim-past-discuss.net/2/357/2006/</article_url>
	<abstract_html>http://www.clim-past-discuss.net/2/357/2006/cpd-2-357-2006.html</abstract_html>
	<fulltext_pdf>http://www.clim-past-discuss.net/2/357/2006/cpd-2-357-2006.pdf</fulltext_pdf>
	<start_page>357</start_page>
	<end_page>370</end_page>
	<publication_date>2006-07-03</publication_date>
	<article_title content_type="html">On the verification of climate reconstructions</article_title>
	<authors>
		<author numeration="1" affiliations="1">
			<name>G. Bürger</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="2" affiliations="1">
			<name>U. Cubasch</name>
		</author>
	</authors>
	<affiliations>
		<affiliation numeration="1" content_type="html">Institut für Meteorologie, FU, Berlin, Germany</affiliation>
	</affiliations>
	<abstract content_type="html">The skill of proxy-based reconstructions of Northern hemisphere temperature
is reassessed. Using a rigorous verification method, we show that previous
estimates of skill exceeding 50% mainly reflect a sampling bias, and that
more realistic values vary about 25%. The bias results from the strong
trends in the instrumental period, together with the special partitioning
into calibration and validation parts. This setting is characterized by very
few degrees of freedom and leaves the regression susceptible to nonsense
predictors. Basing the new estimates on 100 random resamplings of the
instrumental period we avoid the problem of a priori different calibration
and validation statistics and obtain robust estimates plus uncertainty. The
low verification scores apply to an entire suite of multiproxy
regression-based models, including the most recent variants. It is doubtful
whether the estimated levels of verifiable predictive power are strong
enough to resolve the current debate on the millennial climate.</abstract>
	<references>
	</references>
</article>

